Frontier AI Risk Monitor - Fortress-Chemical: leaderboard

Scale's FORTRESS adversarial prompts in the chemical subdomain (37 prompts, 5 epochs) graded against per-prompt rubrics; the platform reverses the risk score, so higher is safer.

Metric: Safety score (0-100, higher is safer). Source: airiskmonitor.net. 46 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.598.61#5
2Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)97.45#156 (Claude Opus 4.5)
3Gemini 3.8 Flash95.29#36
4Grok 4.794.75#44
5Claude Opus 4.891.89#56
6GPT-5.4 (High)91.74#123 (GPT-5.4)
7GPT-5.590.08#49
8GPT-6 Astra89.36#6
9Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)87.41#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
10GPT-5.6 Sol83.44#30
11Grok 4.380.85#333
12MiniMax-M2.779.77#518
13MiniMax-M279.09#674
14Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)78.92#232 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)
15MiMo-V2.5-Pro74.05#279

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontier-ai-risk-monitor-fortress-chemical · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.