Frontier AI Risk Monitor - Fortress-Biological: leaderboard

Scale's FORTRESS adversarial prompts in the biological subdomain (31 prompts, 5 epochs) graded against per-prompt rubrics by DeepSeek V4 Flash; the platform reverses the risk score, so higher is safer.

Metric: Safety score (0-100, higher is safer). Source: airiskmonitor.net. 46 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.598.25#5
2Grok 4.798.25#44
3GPT-6 Astra98.16#6
4Claude Opus 4.897.6#56
5Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)96.11#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
6GPT-5.4 (High)95.74#123 (GPT-5.4)
7GPT-5.595.6#49
8Gemini 3.8 Flash95.21#36
9Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)95.16#156 (Claude Opus 4.5)
10GPT-5.6 Sol90.52#30
11GPT-5.1 (High)89.03#229 (GPT-5.1)
12Grok 4.386.13#333
13MiniMax-M281.43#674
14MiniMax-M2.777.95#518
15Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)77.49#232 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontier-ai-risk-monitor-fortress-biological · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.