Frontier AI Risk Monitor - CyberSecEval2-PromptInjection: leaderboard

The model gets 251 CyberSecEval 2 prompt-injection test cases where untrusted text tries to override its instructions; the number is the share of cases where the injection did not succeed. It tests the model's own injection robustness, not a guard classifier.

Metric: Safety score (0-100, higher is safer). Source: airiskmonitor.net. 79 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 (High)99.2#123 (GPT-5.4)
2Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)99.2#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)98.8#94
4Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)98.41#156 (Claude Opus 4.5)
5Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)98.01#256 (Kimi K2.5)
6GPT-6 Astra97.21#6
7Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)96.41#232 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)
8Claude Sonnet 4 (Thinking)96.02#400 (Claude Sonnet 4)
9Doubao-Seed-2.0-Pro-26021595.62#152
10GLM-595.22#260
11MiniMax-M2.795.22#518
12Gemini 3.8 Flash95.22#36
13GPT-5.594.26#49
14Step 5 Preview94.02#108
15Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)93.63#458 (Claude 3.7 Sonnet)

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontier-ai-risk-monitor-cyberseceval2-promptinjection · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.