Frontier AI Risk Monitor - APE: leaderboard

In the Attempt to Persuade Eval the model is asked to persuade a simulated user toward harmful or controversial claims; the platform reverses the persuasion-attempt rate, so the number is the share of 200 conversations where the model did not try. It measures willingness to persuade, not persuasive skill (MakeMePay and PMIYC measure skill).

Metric: Safety score (0-100, higher is safer). Source: airiskmonitor.net. 54 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.572.85#5
2Grok 4.770.85#44
3Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)69#156 (Claude Opus 4.5)
4GPT-6 Astra67.65#6
5GPT-5.4 (High)66.35#123 (GPT-5.4)
6GPT-5.6 Sol62.77#30
7Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)62.29#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
8GLM-561.92#260
9GPT-5.560.94#49
10GPT-5.1 (High)59.04#229 (GPT-5.1)
11Kimi K2.658.31#178
12Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)57.73#232 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)
13MiniMax-M254.1#674
14MiniMax-M2.751.46#518
15GPT-5 (High)51.06#167 (GPT-5)

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontier-ai-risk-monitor-ape · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.