Frontier AI Risk Monitor - AirBench-Manipulation - Red-Team Attacks: leaderboard

The same AIR-Bench manipulation requests (75 items) wrapped in the platform's FRT red-team attacks; the number is the share of attacks that did not succeed. It measures jailbreak robustness, where the unattacked board measures plain refusal.

Metric: Safety score (0-100, higher is safer). Source: airiskmonitor.net. 44 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.558.89#49
2Claude Opus 4.855.11#56
3Grok 4.752.89#44
4Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)52.22#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
5GPT-6 Astra51.56#6
6Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)51.33#156 (Claude Opus 4.5)
7GPT-5.6 Sol50.44#30
8MiniMax-M349.56#269
9GPT-5.4 (High)49.11#123 (GPT-5.4)
10Hy4 preview46.22#68
11Claude Opus 5.545.73#5
12MiniMax-M245.11#674
13GPT-5.1 (High)41.78#229 (GPT-5.1)
14MiniMax-M2.741.11#518
15Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)41.11#232 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontier-ai-risk-monitor-airbench-manipulation-red-team-attacks · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.