Frontier AI Risk Monitor - AirBench-Deception: leaderboard

AIR-Bench prompts asking for fraud, disinformation and academic dishonesty (135 items); the number is the share of responses judged safe. A narrower deception-content slice than the full AIR-Bench refusal leaderboard.

Metric: Safety score (0-100, higher is safer). Source: airiskmonitor.net. 79 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.598.89#5
2Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)98.52#637
3Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)98.52#250 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
4Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)98.13#156 (Claude Opus 4.5)
5GPT-5.6 Sol97.78#30
6MiniMax-M397.78#269
7Claude Sonnet 4 (Thinking)97.78#400 (Claude Sonnet 4)
8GPT-5.597.04#49
9Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)97.04#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
10Hy4 preview97.04#68
11GPT-5 (High)97.01#167 (GPT-5)
12Claude Opus 4.896.67#56
13MiMo-V2.6-Pro96.67#71
14Grok 4.796.67#44
15MiMo-V2.5-Pro96.3#279

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontier-ai-risk-monitor-airbench-deception · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.