FrameBench - Japanese: leaderboard

FrameBench (arXiv 2609.03370v1, Table 3) Japanese set: multiple-choice questions testing whether a model distinguishes the semantic frames evoked by the same verb across contexts, built from Japanese FrameNet-style resources with native-speaker validation. Accuracy averaged over five prompt templates, in percent; higher is better. Reasoning and non-reasoning runs are separate rows.

Metric: Accuracy (%; mean of five prompt templates). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)99.1#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
2Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Non-reasoning)97.6#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)97.5#64
4Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)97.3#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
5GPT-596.3#105
6Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)93.9#449 (Qwen 3 32B)
7Gemma 4 E4B (IT) (Thinking)92.2
8Qwen 3.5 9B (Thinking)91.8#391 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
9Qwen 3.5 4B (Thinking)89.9#514 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
10Qwen 3 8B (Thinking)85#678 (Qwen 3 8B)
11Gemma 4 E4B (IT) (Non-reasoning)84.6
12llm-jp-4-8B-Thinking84.5#529
13GPT-5 Nano83.9#439
14Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)83.7#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
15Gemma 4 E2B (IT) (Thinking)82.3#779 (Gemma 4 E2B (IT))

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=framebench-japanese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.