FrameBench - English: leaderboard

FrameBench (arXiv 2609.03370v1, Table 3) English set: multiple-choice questions testing whether a model distinguishes the semantic frames evoked by the same verb across contexts, built from FrameNet-style resources with native-speaker validation. Accuracy averaged over five prompt templates, in percent; higher is better. Reasoning and non-reasoning runs are separate rows.

Metric: Accuracy (%; mean of five prompt templates). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)99.3#64
2GPT-599.1#105
3Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)98.6#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
4Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)98.6#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
5Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Non-reasoning)97.5#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
6Qwen 3.5 9B (Thinking)97.3#391 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
7Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)96.1#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
8Qwen 3.5 4B (Thinking)95.5#514 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
9Gemma 4 E4B (IT) (Thinking)94.5
10GPT-5 Nano93.5#439
11Gemma 4 E2B (IT) (Thinking)86.3#779 (Gemma 4 E2B (IT))
12Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)85.8#391 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
13Gemma 4 E4B (IT) (Non-reasoning)82.5
14Qwen 3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)81.1#514 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
15Qwen 3.5 2B (Thinking)80.3#1114 (Qwen 3.5 2B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=framebench-english · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.