FormStruct-Bench - Schema Similarity: leaderboard

FormStruct-Bench (2026) evaluates structure recognition of table-form documents, generated from 70 annotated real-world templates in seven languages, by asking a system to output the page as a hierarchical JSON record. Schema-nTED is one minus the normalized tree edit distance between the predicted and gold schema trees (field names, containers and hierarchy, values ignored), macro-averaged over the 1,100 human-reviewed test pages in percent; invalid outputs score 0 and higher is better.

Metric: Schema-nTED (%; 1 minus the normalized tree edit distance between predicted and ground-truth schema trees that keep field names, container types and hierarchy but drop values; macro-averaged over the 1,100 human-reviewed pages of the template-disjoint test split of table-form documents in seven languages; the model outputs the page as FormStruct-Bench JSON (deterministic decoding where available; pipelines as released), and missing, unparsable or schema-invalid outputs score 0). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.554.15#48
2Seed 2.1 Pro52.81#133
3Claude Sonnet 552.22#108
4Gemini 3.5 Flash48.59#98
5Qwen 3.6 35B A3B48.46#461
6Kimi K2.648.2#173
7Qwen 3.5 9B45.58#803
8Qwen 3.7 Plus34.01#203

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=formstruct-bench-schema-similarity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.