FMG-Bench - Perspective-Compare Harness: leaderboard

FMG-Bench v1 (arXiv 2608.12324v1 Table 8; authors' results/model_scores.csv): 14 models on 628 rendered theological and pastoral scenarios across four triage levels, scored 0-100 by a three-model judge panel (GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview, Claude Sonnet 4.6); higher is better. Perspective-compare condition: preference-aware harness that must also surface faithful disagreement between traditions.

Metric: Judge-panel score (0-100; faithful disagreement surfaced). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.794.57#51
2GPT-5.494.12#83
3Kimi K2.693.82#113
4Qwen 3.6 Plus93.18#124
5Grok 4.2092.94#179
6DeepSeek V4 Pro91.93#112
7GLM-5.191.34#109
8MiMo-V2.5-Pro90.87#167
9Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)89.75#64
10Nemotron 3 Super88.31#344
11MiniMax-M2.784.6#270
12Mistral Large 384.42#410
13Seed 2.0 Lite79.16#161
14Llama 4 Maverick77.09#486

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fmg-bench-perspective-compare-harness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.