FLY-EVAL++ - History-Conditioned Prediction - Total: leaderboard

FLY-EVAL++ (arXiv 2609.04021v1, Table 1): history-conditioned one-step flight-state prediction (M1) total score from deterministic protocol, field, physics, safety and accuracy verifiers. Percent; higher is better. Near-saturated in the paper (standard deviation 0.53 across models). Only the 21 of 66 screened models above 90% protocol compliance are listed.

Metric: M1 total score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-597.31#105
2Gemini 3 Pro97.23#82
3DeepSeek V397.14#329
4DeepSeek V3.2 Exp97.08#241
5Qwen 2.5 32B97.02#544
6Qwen 3 235B A22B97.01#323
7Qwen 3 32B96.98#449
8Claude 3.7 Sonnet (20250219)96.96#209
9Qwen3-Next-80B96.94#321
10GPT-4o96.92#357
11Llama 3.1 405B96.85#476
12Claude Sonnet 4.596.84#148
13O4 Mini96.79#185
14Kimi K2 (Thinking)96.77#252 (Kimi K2)
15Gemini 2.5 Pro96.76#159

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fly-eval-plus-plus-history-conditioned-prediction-total · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.