FireWorldBench (Structured Records): leaderboard

FireWorldBench (Chen et al., 2026) tests understanding of coupled-field fire dynamics on 494 simulated fire worlds: models forecast evolution, ground observations in physical fields, relate coupled fields, attribute causal mechanisms and predict intervention outcomes. Observations are given as structured sensor traces and physical records; the score is completion accuracy in percent averaged over the five capability dimensions and over matched multiple-choice and open-report questions and scored deterministically; higher is better.

Metric: Completion accuracy (%; equal-weight mean of the five physical-capability dimensions P1-P5 on the 8,360-item controlled-simulation subset; structured-observation track (textual sensor traces and physical records); each cell is the mean of the matched choice-format score (Jaccard overlap of selected and gold option sets) and open-report score (exact agreement of required structured slots); deterministic evaluator, no LLM judge; failed or unparseable responses score 0). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2028. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Luna55.34#117
2DeepSeek V3.249.28#403
3Gemma 3 27B (IT)48.59#1306
4Kimi K247.32#435
5Qwen 3.5 Plus (2026-02-15)47.25#178
6Gemini 2.5 Flash46.2#452
7Qwen 3 32B45.3#960
8Claude Haiku 4.544.78#568
9Qwen 3 235B A22B43.78#622
10Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct39.48#763
11GLM 4.5 Air39.23#863
12Llama 3.3 70B Instruct38.8#1353
13Qwen 3 8B38.07#1838
14Gemma 3 12B (IT)33.7#1849
15Llama 3.1 8B Instruct31.64#4277

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fireworldbench-structured-records · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.