FireWorldBench - Cross-Field Coupling Understanding (Structured Records): leaderboard

The cross-field coupling understanding dimension of FireWorldBench (Chen et al., 2026): relating coupled fields of a simulated fire, such as plume shape and flow, to predict smoke transport. Observations are given as structured sensor traces and physical records; the score is completion accuracy in percent, averaged over matched multiple-choice and open-report questions and scored deterministically; higher is better.

Metric: Completion accuracy (%; P3, cross-field coupling understanding items of the controlled-simulation subset; structured-observation track (textual sensor traces and physical records); each cell is the mean of the matched choice-format score (Jaccard overlap of selected and gold option sets) and open-report score (exact agreement of required structured slots); deterministic evaluator, no LLM judge; failed or unparseable responses score 0). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2028. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Luna55.49#117
2Gemma 3 27B (IT)46.56#1306
3DeepSeek V3.245.12#403
4Kimi K244.53#435
5Qwen 3 235B A22B43.73#622
6Qwen 3.5 Plus (2026-02-15)42.76#178
7Gemini 2.5 Flash42.52#452
8Qwen 3 32B40.16#960
9Claude Haiku 4.539.92#568
10GLM 4.5 Air39.84#863
11Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct39.53#763
12Llama 3.3 70B Instruct37.11#1353
13Qwen 3 8B33.88#1838
14Gemma 3 12B (IT)33.3#1849
15Llama 3.1 8B Instruct28.38#4277

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fireworldbench-cross-field-coupling-understanding-structured-records · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.