FireBench - Negative Content Requirements: leaderboard

Metric: Share of the 200 negative content requirements samples (%) in which the model performs the expected action: completing the same Arena-Hard 2.0 prompts while avoiding every forbidden operation, format or content type, judged by GPT-4.1; FireBench enterprise and API instruction following; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4.194.5#240
2Kimi K2 Instruct (0905)94.5#247
3Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct93.5#291
4Llama 4 Maverick Instruct91.5#439
5Kimi K2 (Thinking)86#236 (Kimi K2)
6Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)84.2#253 (Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507)
7GPT-5.1 (Medium)84#131 (GPT-5.1)
8GPT-5.1 Instant82.5#277
9DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus81.4#212
10GPT-OSS-120B78.5#330
11Claude Sonnet 4.574.5#138

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=firebench-negative-content-requirements · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.