FIRE (Finance, Qualification Exams) - Futures Practitioner: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the Futures Practitioner questions of FIRE's financial-qualification set (about 14,000 multiple-choice questions from 14 professional certification exams); exact option match; each model with its recommended inference settings, else temperature 0.6 and top-p 0.8; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Seed-1.691.9#257
2Gemini 3 Pro89.83#77
3Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct87.16#348
4Qwen 3 Max86.15#201
5Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)85.19#253 (Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507)
6DeepSeek V3.284.7#198
7Kimi K2 (Thinking)84.3#236 (Kimi K2)
8GLM-4.682.13#246
9GPT-5.279.86#105
10Claude Sonnet 4.579.17#138
11GPT-OSS-120B70.58#330

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fire-finance-qualification-exams-futures-practitioner · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.