FinReasoning (Deep Insight) - Justification and Causal Depth: leaderboard

Metric: Rubric score (0-100): a judge score fused from DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen3-235B on three indicators scored 0 to 5 and weighted 40/30/30, comparing the model's open-ended analysis with an expert-verified reference answer (logical chain, causal depth, professionalism), on the 300 causal-depth items of FinReasoning's Deep Insight track (open-ended analysis of events in research-report excerpts); Chinese-language tasks built from A-share research reports, news and market data (2023 to 2025); zero-shot at temperature 0.1; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K296.3#236
2Claude Sonnet 4.596.2#138
3GLM-4.696.1#246
4Seed 1.895.7#136
5DeepSeek R189.8#245
6Intern-S188#278
7DeepSeek V386.4#312
8Qwen 3 Max82.9#201
9GPT-581.8#91
10Gemini 3 Pro80.7#77
11GPT-4o76.9#333
12Qwen 3 235B A22B67.5#304
13Qwen 3 32B65.7#424
14Qwen 3 8B57.4#667
15Llama 3.1 70B36.8#578

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=finreasoning-deep-insight-justification-and-causal-depth · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.