FinReasoning (Deep Insight) - Completeness and Comparative Analysis: leaderboard

Metric: Rubric score (0-100): a judge score fused from DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen3-235B on three indicators scored 0 to 5 and weighted 40/30/30, comparing the model's open-ended analysis with an expert-verified reference answer (critical thinking, comparative perspective, argument balance), on the 300 completeness items of FinReasoning's Deep Insight track (open-ended analysis of events in research-report excerpts); Chinese-language tasks built from A-share research reports, news and market data (2023 to 2025); zero-shot at temperature 0.1; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K289.5#236
2GLM-4.687.3#246
3GPT-586.7#91
4Seed 1.886.2#136
5Claude Sonnet 4.584.5#138
6Intern-S181.6#278
7DeepSeek R180#245
8DeepSeek V377.9#312
9Gemini 3 Pro76.7#77
10Qwen 3 Max75.8#201
11GPT-4o74.8#333
12Qwen 3 235B A22B63.6#304
13Qwen 3 32B60.3#424
14Qwen 3 8B53.9#667
15Llama 3.1 70B34.7#578

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=finreasoning-deep-insight-completeness-and-comparative-analysis · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.