FinReasoning (Deep Insight): leaderboard

Metric: Rubric score (0-100): a judge score fused from DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen3-235B on three indicators scored 0 to 5 and weighted 40/30/30, comparing the model's open-ended analysis with an expert-verified reference answer, averaged over the four rubric categories (300 items each) of FinReasoning's Deep Insight track (open-ended analysis of events in research-report excerpts); Chinese-language tasks built from A-share research reports, news and market data (2023 to 2025); zero-shot at temperature 0.1; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K291.6#236
2GLM-4.691#246
3Seed 1.890.6#136
4Claude Sonnet 4.590#138
5GPT-586.4#91
6DeepSeek R185.6#245
7Intern-S184#278
8DeepSeek V381.8#312
9Qwen 3 Max80.1#201
10Gemini 3 Pro79.6#77
11GPT-4o77.3#333
12Qwen 3 235B A22B67.6#304
13Qwen 3 32B65.3#424
14Qwen 3 8B57.9#667
15Llama 3.1 70B37.7#578

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=finreasoning-deep-insight · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.