FinEval 6.0 - Financial Rigor: leaderboard
Financial rigor dimension of the FinEval 6.0 evaluation report: retrieval-grounded questions, often numeric, that check whether answers stay factually exact rather than hallucinated. Scored on a 0-100 scale; higher is better.
Metric: Score (0-100). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 9 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o | 80.59 | #741 |
| 2 | Qwen 3 32B (Thinking) | 73.07 | #960 (Qwen 3 32B) |
| 3 | Qwen 3 32B | 72.97 | #960 |
| 4 | Qwen 3 30B A3B | 71.48 | #1124 |
| 5 | Llama 3.3 70B | 64.13 | #1511 |
| 6 | GLM-Z1-32B-0414 | 58.63 | #755 |
| 7 | InternLM3-8B-Instruct | 42.37 | #2586 |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fineval-6-0-financial-rigor · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.