FDE Requirement Discovery - Moderate ambiguity: leaderboard

Enterprise text-to-SQL FDE study Table 1:10 independent simulated-customer discovery trajectories per model and ambiguity level; recovery of 17 known core requirements, judged against frozen annotations. The three ambiguity levels and their mean remain separate. Dialogue counts do not measure capability and delivery-agent training outcomes are different protocols. No unreported reasoning setting is inferred. Metric: Recovery rate (%).

Metric: Recovery rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.584.4#3
2Claude Opus 581.3#16
3Claude Sonnet 5.579.4#14
4GPT-6.1 Sol76.9#7
5Claude Fable 576.3#20
6Grok 4.763.1#26
7Gemini 2.5 Flash62.5#255
8GPT-5.6 Sol60.6#22
9Llama 3.3 70B55.6#578
10GPT-5.4 Mini46.3#228
11GLM-5.3 Flash46.3#77
12Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)45.6#179 (Grok 4.20)
13Command A41.3#498
14GPT-OSS-120B39.4#346
15Gemma 4 31B37.5#212

No result here: #6 GPT-6 Astra, #9 Gemini 4 Argon, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fde-requirement-discovery-moderate-ambiguity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.