FDE Requirement Discovery - Mean: leaderboard

Enterprise text-to-SQL FDE study Table 1:10 independent simulated-customer discovery trajectories per model and ambiguity level; recovery of 17 known core requirements, judged against frozen annotations. The three ambiguity levels and their mean remain separate. Dialogue counts do not measure capability and delivery-agent training outcomes are different protocols. No unreported reasoning setting is inferred. Metric: Recovery rate (%).

Metric: Recovery rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.581.7#3
2Claude Opus 581.1#16
3Claude Sonnet 5.578.4#14
4GPT-6.1 Sol75.2#7
5Claude Fable 573.8#20
6Grok 4.770.1#26
7GPT-5.6 Sol68.4#22
8Gemini 2.5 Flash57.8#255
9Gemma 4 31B49.4#212
10GLM-5.3 Flash46.2#77
11Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)44.6#179 (Grok 4.20)
12GPT-OSS-120B43.6#346
13Llama 3.3 70B43.4#578
14Command A41.8#498
15GPT-5.4 Mini40.6#228

No result here: #6 GPT-6 Astra, #9 Gemini 4 Argon, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fde-requirement-discovery-mean · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.