FDE Requirement Discovery - Low ambiguity: leaderboard

Enterprise text-to-SQL FDE study Table 1:10 independent simulated-customer discovery trajectories per model and ambiguity level; recovery of 17 known core requirements, judged against frozen annotations. The three ambiguity levels and their mean remain separate. Dialogue counts do not measure capability and delivery-agent training outcomes are different protocols. No unreported reasoning setting is inferred. Metric: Recovery rate (%).

Metric: Recovery rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 581.4#16
2Claude Opus 5.577.1#3
3Claude Sonnet 5.577.1#14
4Grok 4.774.3#26
5GPT-5.6 Sol72.9#22
6GPT-6.1 Sol72.1#7
7Claude Fable 570#20
8Gemma 4 31B50.7#212
9Gemini 2.5 Flash48.6#255
10Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)45.7#179 (Grok 4.20)
11GPT-OSS-120B40.7#346
12GLM-5.3 Flash40#77
13Command A32.9#498
14GPT-5.4 Mini31.4#228
15Llama 3.3 70B29.3#578

No result here: #6 GPT-6 Astra, #9 Gemini 4 Argon, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fde-requirement-discovery-low-ambiguity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.