FDE-Gym L3 full 95: leaderboard

FDE-Gym primary paper, 13 configurations in one minimal five-tool agent framework; scripted stakeholders and held-out production data. Native business uplift minus stakeholder-contact cost; negative scores are valid, not percentages. Reference solution 1 is not a theoretical ceiling. No effort inferred where not reported; Haiku extended-thinking run stays separate. L3 full 95 task cohort; same three scenarios have identical L2/L3 instructions. Metric: Mean delivery score. Higher is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.22350v1

Metric: Mean delivery score. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2027. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.50.56#3
2Claude Sonnet 5.50.49#10
3GPT-6 Astra0.38#5
4GPT-6.1 Sol0.37#8
5GLM-5.3 Flash0.22#62
6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash0.21#35
7Gemini 3.8 Flash0.19#21
8Qwen 3.8 Flash0.07#47
9GPT-5.50.03#30
10GPT-6 Luna-0.12#52
11Mistral Small 4-0.32#512
12Claude Haiku 4.5-0.33#277
13Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking)-0.35#277 (Claude Haiku 4.5)

No result here: #7 Gemini 4 Argon, #9 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fde-gym-l3-full-95 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-17.