FDE-Gym L0 original 20: leaderboard

FDE-Gym primary paper, 13 configurations in one minimal five-tool agent framework; scripted stakeholders and held-out production data. Native business uplift minus stakeholder-contact cost; negative scores are valid, not percentages. Reference solution 1 is not a theoretical ceiling. No effort inferred where not reported; Haiku extended-thinking run stays separate. L0 original 20 task cohort; same three scenarios have identical L2/L3 instructions. Metric: Mean delivery score. Higher is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.22350v1

Metric: Mean delivery score. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2027. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.50.82#3
2GPT-6.1 Sol0.76#8
3Claude Sonnet 5.50.74#10
4GPT-6 Astra0.73#5
5GLM-5.3 Flash0.68#62
6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash0.61#35
7Gemini 3.8 Flash0.58#21
8GPT-5.50.51#30
9Qwen 3.8 Flash0.36#47
10Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking)0.14#277 (Claude Haiku 4.5)
11GPT-6 Luna0.12#52
12Claude Haiku 4.50.11#277
13Mistral Small 4-0.07#512

No result here: #7 Gemini 4 Argon, #9 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fde-gym-l0-original-20 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-17.