FCMBench V1.1 - Validity Checking: leaderboard

Evaluates visual credit-document understanding on FCMBench V1.1: 26 document types, 5,198 images and 13,806 VQA pairs. Exact-match key/value sets are scored with F1; task scores macro-average fine-grained subtasks. Numeric calculation permits differences below 2. The paper prefers instruct or lowest available reasoning effort. The two-stage DeepSeek-OCR plus V3.2 system stays distinct from either model alone. These are paper V1.1 scores, not the differing repository leaderboard. This series reports FCMBench V1.1 - Validity Checking using F1 (%).

Metric: F1 (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro87.27#82
2Gemini 3 Flash73.06#103
3Qwen 3.5 397B A17B71.87#154
4Claude Opus 4.571.21#87
5Kimi K2.566.65#152
6GLM-4.5V61.16#358
7Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct60.8#290
8GLM-4.6V60.6#330
9GPT-5.260.05#115
10Llama 4 Maverick59.78#486
11GPT-5.159.16#145
12Qwen 3.5 122B A10B58.04#184
13Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct57.37#280
14Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct55.36#390
15Qwen 3.5 35B A3B54.38#268

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fcmbench-v1-1-validity-checking · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.