FCMBench V1.1 - Rationality Review: leaderboard

Evaluates visual credit-document understanding on FCMBench V1.1: 26 document types, 5,198 images and 13,806 VQA pairs. Exact-match key/value sets are scored with F1; task scores macro-average fine-grained subtasks. Numeric calculation permits differences below 2. The paper prefers instruct or lowest available reasoning effort. The two-stage DeepSeek-OCR plus V3.2 system stays distinct from either model alone. These are paper V1.1 scores, not the differing repository leaderboard. This series reports FCMBench V1.1 - Rationality Review using F1 (%).

Metric: F1 (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2028. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro69.56#82
2Kimi K2.568.31#152
3Gemini 3 Flash62.82#103
4Claude Opus 4.562.02#87
5Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct54.65#290
6Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct51.59#390
7Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct51.24#419
8Qwen 3.5 122B A10B50.45#184
9Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct49.97#280
10GPT-5.249.1#115
11Qwen 3.5 35B A3B48.18#268
12Qwen 3.5 397B A17B45.8#154
13Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct45.8#922
14GLM-4.5V45.56#358
15GPT-5.143.98#145

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fcmbench-v1-1-rationality-review · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.