FalseCite: leaderboard

Metric: Hallucination rate (%) when the false claim is given with no citation; FalseCite prompts built from false FEVER claims and false SciQ answer statements; a GPT-4.1 judge labels each response hallucinated when it accepts or elaborates the false claim, and responses it marks unsure count as not hallucinated; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 3 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4o Mini23.97#588

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=falsecite · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.