FactArena - Justification Readability: leaderboard

FactArena (Lin et al., 2026) rating of fact-checking justifications for readability: clear, grammatical and easy-to-follow writing. Ratings come from anonymous pairwise comparisons judged by a four-model panel, fitted on the Elo scale with a Bradley-Terry model; higher is better.

Metric: Elo rating from pairwise judged comparisons. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O3 (2025-04-16)1268.83#212
2DeepSeek R11117.53#467
3O4 Mini (2025-04-16)1097.51#362
4Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 06-05)1077.44#207
5GPT-4.5 (Preview)1041.03#499
6GPT-4.11029.11#492
7Grok 31019.52#600
8Gemini 2.5 Flash980.5#452
9Grok 3 Mini Beta974.06#615
10DeepSeek V3951.61#705
11Claude Opus 4 (20250514)933.39#276
12Qwen 3 235B A22B922.65#622
13GPT-4o913.03#741
14Llama 4 Maverick Instruct909.13#1125
15Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514)892.76#386

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=factarena-justification-readability · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.