FactArena - Justification Informativeness: leaderboard

FactArena (Lin et al., 2026) rating of fact-checking justifications for informativeness: including the salient facts from the evidence needed to verify the claim. Ratings come from anonymous pairwise comparisons judged by a four-model panel, fitted on the Elo scale with a Bradley-Terry model; higher is better.

Metric: Elo rating from pairwise judged comparisons. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O3 (2025-04-16)1331.77#212
2DeepSeek R11160.02#467
3O4 Mini (2025-04-16)1101.49#362
4Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 06-05)1078.02#207
5GPT-4.5 (Preview)1039.95#499
6GPT-4.11032.77#492
7Grok 31026.11#600
8Grok 3 Mini Beta966.4#615
9Claude Opus 4 (20250514)961.3#276
10Gemini 2.5 Flash945.27#452
11Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514)930.52#386
12Llama 4 Maverick Instruct926.36#1125
13DeepSeek V3923.45#705
14Qwen 3 235B A22B882.68#622
15GPT-4o872.55#741

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=factarena-justification-informativeness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.