FactArena - Justification Helpfulness: leaderboard

FactArena (Lin et al., 2026) rating of fact-checking justifications for helpfulness: consistency with the model's final verdict, without misleading or contradictory reasoning. Ratings come from anonymous pairwise comparisons judged by a four-model panel, fitted on the Elo scale with a Bradley-Terry model; higher is better.

Metric: Elo rating from pairwise judged comparisons. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O3 (2025-04-16)1294.67#212
2DeepSeek R11141.88#467
3O4 Mini (2025-04-16)1094.46#362
4Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 06-05)1085.29#207
5GPT-4.5 (Preview)1052.08#499
6GPT-4.11044#492
7Grok 31027#600
8Grok 3 Mini Beta965.29#615
9Gemini 2.5 Flash962.62#452
10Claude Opus 4 (20250514)953.03#276
11DeepSeek V3937.19#705
12Llama 4 Maverick Instruct922.33#1125
13Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514)905.29#386
14Qwen 3 235B A22B893.44#622
15GPT-4o888.45#741

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=factarena-justification-helpfulness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.