FactArena - Claim Extraction: leaderboard

FactArena (Lin et al., 2026) stage rating for decomposing a complex claim into verifiable sub-claims, compared against a guideline consolidated from all models' decompositions. Ratings come from anonymous pairwise comparisons judged by a four-model panel, fitted on the Elo scale with a Bradley-Terry model; higher is better.

Metric: Elo rating from pairwise judged comparisons. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O3 (2025-04-16)1188.11#212
2DeepSeek R11096.22#467
3O4 Mini (2025-04-16)1081#362
4GPT-4.5 (Preview)1050.66#499
5Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 06-05)1046.19#207
6GPT-4.11018.24#492
7Grok 3995.75#600
8Grok 3 Mini Beta979.61#615
9Claude Opus 4 (20250514)973.2#276
10Gemini 2.5 Flash969.48#452
11DeepSeek V3968.84#705
12Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514)940.14#386
13GPT-4o937.6#741
14Qwen 3 235B A22B936.05#622
15Llama 4 Maverick Instruct919.58#1125

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=factarena-claim-extraction · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.