EYT-Bench (PersonaMem-v2) - Anthropomorphic Interaction: leaderboard

EYT-Bench (Enjoy Your Talk, 2026) evaluates LLMs as multi-turn conversational partners with a persona-grounded user simulator and an independent LLM judge; each turn the target model predicts the user state before replying. Judge-rated anthropomorphic interaction quality (colloquial, emotional, flowing replies) on a 0 to 100 scale on the PersonaMem-v2 pool of free-text personas distilled from real conversations; higher is better.

Metric: Anthropomorphic interaction (colloquial, emotional, flow, flexibility, rhythm) (0-100): judge rubric of five sub-indicators scored 0, 0.5 or 1 per turn, summed to 0-5, turn weighted with the first two turns at 0.10 each and rescaled to 0-100; multi-turn dialogues of up to 10 turns with a persona-grounded Gemini 3.1 Pro user simulator and a Gemini 3.1 Pro judge (reasoning effort high, temperature 0); PersonaMem-v2 pool (100 dialogues; personas are free-text paragraphs distilled from long real user-assistant interactions). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.693.7#161
2Claude Opus 4.793.3#79
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)92.8#94 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
4Seed 2.0 Pro92.7#211
5DeepSeek V4 Pro91.9#188
6Qwen 3.5 27B90.5#359
7Seed 2.0 Lite88.6#289
8Qwen 3.5 397B A17B88.4#246
9Qwen 3.5 35B A3B88.2#482
10DeepSeek V4 Flash84.9#258
11GPT-5.576.4#49
12Seed 2.0 Mini62.7#508

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=eyt-bench-personamem-v2-anthropomorphic-interaction · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.