EYT-Bench (Nemotron-USA) - Anthropomorphic Interaction: leaderboard

EYT-Bench (Enjoy Your Talk, 2026) evaluates LLMs as multi-turn conversational partners with a persona-grounded user simulator and an independent LLM judge; each turn the target model predicts the user state before replying. Judge-rated anthropomorphic interaction quality (colloquial, emotional, flowing replies) on a 0 to 100 scale on the Nemotron-Personas-USA pool of structured demographic personas; higher is better.

Metric: Anthropomorphic interaction (colloquial, emotional, flow, flexibility, rhythm) (0-100): judge rubric of five sub-indicators scored 0, 0.5 or 1 per turn, summed to 0-5, turn weighted with the first two turns at 0.10 each and rescaled to 0-100; multi-turn dialogues of up to 10 turns with a persona-grounded Gemini 3.1 Pro user simulator and a Gemini 3.1 Pro judge (reasoning effort high, temperature 0); Nemotron-Personas-USA pool (100 dialogues; structured demographic personas). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Seed 2.0 Pro96#211
2Claude Sonnet 4.695.9#161
3Claude Opus 4.794.9#79
4Seed 2.0 Lite94.2#289
5DeepSeek V4 Pro92.9#188
6Qwen 3.5 27B92.4#359
7Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)90.9#94 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
8Qwen 3.5 397B A17B90.7#246
9DeepSeek V4 Flash89.2#258
10Qwen 3.5 35B A3B88.2#482
11GPT-5.575.6#49
12Seed 2.0 Mini75.4#508

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=eyt-bench-nemotron-usa-anthropomorphic-interaction · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.