EvoGUI-Bench - Successor Discrimination: leaderboard

The successor probe of EvoGUI-Bench (Tsinghua University, 2026): pick the logged next screen over a distractor from another trajectory, the same domain or a later step of the same workflow. Accuracy in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Pairwise successor accuracy (%; share of 1,000 items in which the model picks the logged next screen over a cross-trajectory, same-domain or later-step distractor; on EvoGUI-Bench, 3,000 zero-shot visual question answering probes mined from Mind2Web and WebLINX web trajectories across 120 domains, screenshots at max_image_side 512, temperature 0; higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)83.6#144
2Doubao-Seed-2.0-Pro-26021580.9#152
3Kimi K2.679.4#178
4Qwen 3.5 122B A10B77.8#331
5GLM-5V Turbo76.9#344
6Kimi K2.576.3#256
7MiMo-V2.576.1#354
8GPT-5.475.4#123
9Qwen 3.5 35B A3B74.7#482
10Qwen 3.6 35B A3B74.7#462
11Qwen 3.5 27B74.1#359
12GPT-5.4 Nano73.5#635
13Qwen 3.6 27B72.6#341
14Grok 4.2072.3#297
15Qwen 3.5 2B71.3#4810

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evogui-bench-successor-discrimination · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.