EvoEval Verbose: leaderboard

The Verbose benchmark of EvoEval (arXiv) — problems with lengthy, padded prompts; Pass@1 (%).

Metric: Pass@1 (%). Source: evo-eval.github.io. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 51 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4 Turbo79.27#404
2Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v272.56#1589
3deepseek-coder-6.7B-instruct72.56#1335
4Claude 3 Haiku71.34#803
5ChatGPT70.73#900
6GPT-470.12#438
7Magicoder-S-DS-6.7B69.51#1256
8Claude 266.46#761
9Magicoder-S-CL-7B65.85#1489
10Qwen 1.5 72B64.02#753
11Gemini 1.0 Pro58.54#933
12deepseek-coder-1.3B-instruct57.32#1585
13Qwen 1.5 14B53.05#1096
14Phi-251.22#1511
15Qwen-14B48.78#1171

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evoeval-verbose · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.