EviPathBench - Image-to-Text Matching: leaderboard

EviPathBench (2026) evaluates vision-language models on whole-slide pathology using diagnostic paths that pathologists annotated at three magnifications on TCGA slides; each question has four options. This board asks the model to pick the finding written by a pathologist that describes a slide region; accuracy in percent over all magnifications, chance is 25 and higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%) pooled over all questions (the All part of each cell) on Task 1: choosing the pathologist's finding for a slide region image among four descriptions; EviPathBench: pathologist-authored diagnostic paths on 1,822 TCGA whole-slide images (16 organs), findings at 2.5x, 10x and 40x magnification; four options per question with distractors mined from the same organ and magnification; parsed choice scored by exact match; chance 25; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Flash63.48#164
2Kimi K2.558.08#256
3Qwen 3.5 Flash54.36#435
4GPT-5.252.23#176
5MedGemma 1.5 4B36.37#2562
6Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct33.22#1833
7MedGemma-4B31.63#2444

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evipathbench-image-to-text-matching · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.