EvalMORAAL: leaderboard

The model rates, with a chain-of-thought prompt, how acceptable 19 contested behaviours (abortion, bribery, euthanasia and others) are in each of 55 countries; the score is the Pearson correlation with the World Values Survey 2017-2022 country averages. It tests how well a model represents how moral attitudes vary between countries, not whether its own verdicts are right.

Metric: Pearson r between direct chain-of-thought ratings and World Values Survey country averages. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude 3 Opus (20240229)0.9#1103
2GPT-4o (2024-05-13)0.89#735
3Gemini 1.0 Pro0.89#4043
4GPT-4 (0613)0.85#1214
5GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)0.84#1510
6Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct0.83#6810
7Mistral Large 2 (Jul)0.81#1155
8Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)0.77#6653
9Gemini 2.0 Flash (Preview)0.77#736
10O1 Preview (2024-09-12)0.77#391
11Llama 3.3 70B Instruct0.75#1357
12Claude 3 Sonnet (20240229)0.73#1911
13Llama 3.2 3B Instruct0.73#7147
14Command-R+ (08-2024)0.72#2551
15GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125)0.7#3500

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evalmoraal · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.