ESF-Bench - Selection: leaderboard

ESF-Bench (ServiceNow, 2026) slot accuracy on slots tagged with the Selection scenario category: choosing among candidate values from the conversation, sources or schema enums. In percent, higher is better.

Metric: Tagged slot accuracy (%; slots tagged with a SEL (Selection) scenario, choosing among candidate values from the conversation, sources or schema enums; 810 synthetic multi-turn enterprise slot-filling samples (6,530 slots, 8 domains) whose prompts combine a schema, a user-assistant conversation and auxiliary sources; varied output formats mapped to a standard form before exact comparison with the ground truth; 32k maximum tokens, reasoning setting as printed per model). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 2.5 Flash89.5#453
2Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)83.1#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
3GPT-5.1 (High)82.6#229 (GPT-5.1)
4GPT-OSS-120B (Low)81.5#700 (GPT-OSS-120B)
5Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-251280.8#1396
6GPT-OSS-120B (High)80.3#700 (GPT-OSS-120B)
7GPT-5.1 (Non-reasoning)75.6#229 (GPT-5.1)
8Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)72.3#453 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
9Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-251268.6#1593
10Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)64.8#960 (Qwen 3 32B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=esf-bench-selection · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.