ES-MemEval QA (Long Context) - Conflict Detection: leaderboard

Questions that need statements contradicting the user's current state noticed and resolved (226 questions). ES-MemEval (Chen et al., Tongji University, 2026) asks questions about the long emotional-support chat histories of 18 virtual users (about 22 sessions and 13K tokens each), scored by token-level F1 in percent against human-checked reference answers; higher is better. The model answers from the dialogue history within the context window the paper gave it: 128K tokens for the open models, 4K for gpt-3.5-turbo and 16K for gpt-4o.

Metric: Token-level F1 (%; answers scored against human-checked reference answers; questions that notice and resolve statements that contradict the user's current state; 226 questions; no retrieval: the dialogue history (11K-19K tokens per user) within the context window the paper gave each model, 128K tokens for the open models, 4K for gpt-3.5-turbo and 16K for gpt-4o). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 5 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-3.5 Turbo21.4#2773
2Mistral Small 3.120.1#1699
3Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct14#3623
4GPT-4o12.1#741
5Ministral-8B-Instruct-24106.3#4720

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=es-memeval-qa-long-context-conflict-detection · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.