EPPCMinerBen (0-Shot) - Evidence Extraction: leaderboard

Metric: Micro-averaged F1 (%) of EPPC evidence extraction (the minimal supporting span for each code-subcode pair, matched to the expert span by containment or token Jaccard similarity of at least 0.6), zero-shot (task description only), mean over seeded runs, on 1,933 expert-annotated sentences from 752 Yale New Haven Health patient-portal secure messages; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama 3.1 70B Instruct78.87#548
2Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M76.69#566
3DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B76.12#640
4DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B72.98#582
5Llama 3.3 70B Instruct71.01#520
6Gemma 2 27B (IT)69.92#633
7Llama 3.1 8B Instruct41.15#1018
8Qwen 2.5 1.5B Instruct36.17#1388
9Llama 3.2 3B Instruct15.25#1321
10Llama 3.2 1B Instruct8.86#1518

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=eppcminerben-0-shot-evidence-extraction · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.