EmoHarbor: leaderboard

Personalised emotional-support dialogue in Chinese from EmoHarbor (Ye, Xiang, Zhang and Zong, 2026; Table 3): a simulated user built from one of 100 real-world profiles (GPT-4o thinker and talker agents) talks with the model for up to 15 turns, then a Qwen3-235B user-evaluator rates the conversation on ten dimensions such as problem resolution, mood improvement, empathy, safety and redundancy. The score is the mean of the ten 1-5 Likert ratings; higher is better.

Metric: Mean of 10 Rubric Dimensions (1-5 Likert). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 235B A22B (Thinking)4.13#622 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
2Gemini 2.5 Pro4.12#262
3Doubao-Seed-1.6 (Thinking)4.02
4DeepSeek R13.9#467
5QwQ-32B3.89#909
6Claude Sonnet 4 (Thinking)3.84#397 (Claude Sonnet 4)
7GPT-53.77#163
8Claude 3.7 Sonnet3.65#455
9DeepSeek V3.1 (Thinking)3.58#500 (DeepSeek V3.1)
10GPT-4o (2024-11-20)3.5#864
11GLM-4.5 (Thinking)3.36#525 (GLM-4.5)
12O3 Mini2.97#536
13Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)2.82#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
14Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct2.63#1093
15Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct2.46#1216

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=emoharbor · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.