EMem-Bench: leaderboard

EMem-Bench (Liang et al., 2026) tests whether multimodal agents build and use memory over long embodied interaction: after a long history of household activity in simulated homes, the agent must complete a new task that depends on something it saw, tracked, learned from a failure or generalized from earlier corrections. Success rate in percent, the unweighted mean of the four task families, with the full history given as text; higher is better.

Metric: Success rate (%; unweighted mean of the four task-family success rates over 2,554 episodes; full-context condition: the complete interaction history as sanitized text plus the current 500 x 500 RGB view, one primitive action per call with deterministic decoding and at most eight target-task steps in AI2-THOR and ProcTHOR homes; an episode succeeds only if the simulator reaches the target terminal state). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Flash64.2#159
2Gemini 2.5 Pro60.8#262
3Qwen 3.6 27B58.2#339
4GPT-5.456.8#121
5Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct43.9#582
6Mistral Small 3.140.9#1699
7GPT-5.4 Mini35.3#389
8InternVL3-38B31.8#905
9Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct30.1#1281
10Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct25.4#982
11InternVL3-8B15.5#1695

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=emem-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.