EHRNote-ChatQA - Content: leaderboard

EHRNote-ChatQA (2026) poses multi-turn 5-way multiple-choice questions over the full sequence of MIMIC-IV discharge summaries of one patient, pairing each content question with an evidence-grounding question about which notes and sections support the answer. This board is content-question accuracy in percent over all turns; higher is better.

Metric: QA-level content-question accuracy (%), micro-averaged over all turns, on 967 multi-turn samples, each over the full set of MIMIC-IV discharge summaries of one patient (1 to 5 notes), 8,036 content and 8,036 paired evidence-grounding 5-way multiple-choice questions (chance 20), chat history kept across turns, greedy decoding where settable; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.498.33#123
2Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)96.17#144
3Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct95.42#766
4Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct93.12#1089
5Llama 4 Scout Instruct92.15#1543
6GPT-5.4 Mini91.63#389
7Qwen 3 4B 2507 Instruct88.4#2163
8DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B82.91#1637
9DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B78.87#1788
10Phi-3.5-mini-instruct76.94#5733
11DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B76.14#2582
12Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-251275.02#2579
13Phi-4 Mini Instruct74.81#6419
14DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B65.31#6754
15MedGemma-4B-IT61.41#2716

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ehrnote-chatqa-content · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.