Ebisu - JF-ICR: leaderboard

Evaluates Japanese financial implicit commitment recognition (JF-ICR) and terminology extraction (JF-TE). This is the paper v1 result table, whose stated generation limit is 1,024; current repository task defaults differ. JF-ICR uses accuracy, JF-TE uses maximal-term F1 and hit rates at 1/5/10, and the mean combines five metrics. Published fractions are converted to percentages. Explicit zero scores are retained; malformed predictions can receive zero under the public evaluator. Source-specified dated checkpoints are retained. This series reports Ebisu - JF-ICR using Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama 4 Scout60.64#648
2Llama-3.3-Swallow-70B-Instruct-v0.459.57#540
3Llama 3.3 70B Instruct56.38#541
4GPT-555.32#105
5Claude Sonnet 4.552.13#148
6DeepSeek V3.151.06#275
7Kimi K245.74#252
8Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct FP845.74#234
9Gemini 3 Flash39.36#103
10Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct38.3#509
11Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-251237.23#625
12Qwen 3 32B19.15#449
13Qwen 3 14B18.09#542
14Qwen 3 8B12.77#678
15Qwen-14B6.38#1153

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ebisu-jf-icr · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.