E-Commerce Bench: leaderboard

Eighteen agents are handed ¥100,000 each and told to run up to four simulated online stores for 365 days against real market data — sourcing, negotiating with suppliers, pricing, managing inventory and staying solvent. The score is end-of-year total assets averaged over five independent episodes, which is why the board spans three orders of magnitude and why two models went bankrupt in 2 of their 5 runs. Qwen, 2026.

Metric: Final Assets (¥k, mean of 5 episodes). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)1431#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
2Claude Fable 5 (Max)805#16 (Claude Fable 5)
3GPT-5.5702#31
4Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)498#37 (Claude Opus 4.8)
5Qwen 3.8 Max472#35
6GLM-5.3 (Max)391#39 (GLM-5.3)
7GLM-5.2 (High)301#73 (GLM-5.2)
8Kimi K3265#30
9Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)259#49 (Claude Opus 4.7)
10GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)258#65 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
11Claude Opus 4.6 (Max)258#63 (Claude Opus 4.6)
12GLM-5.1226#97
13Gemini 3.5 Flash190#60
14Qwen 3.7 Max165#75
15Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)130#58

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=e-commerce-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.