DragOn - Element Resizing: leaderboard
Success rate on the 250 element-resizing examples: resize or rotate a slide element to a requested size within a 2.5 percent tolerance, from the private test split of DragOn (2026), a drag-grounding benchmark for GUI agents. Higher is better.
Metric: Success rate (%) on the element-resizing domain (resize or rotate a slide element within 2.5% tolerance) of the private 1,000-example DragOn test split (250 per domain): from one screenshot and instruction the model outputs the drag's start and end points as JSON, and both must fall inside the pixel-aligned source and target boxes; each model at its documented settings (Claude extended thinking off, Kimi-K2.5 reasoning off, local Qwen and Holo models with chain-of-thought on); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around March 2028. 8 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.4 | 20 | #123 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 16.8 | #250 |
| 3 | Qwen 3.5 397B A17B | 13.6 | #246 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 8.8 | #79 |
| 5 | Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) | 4 | #256 (Kimi K2.5) |
| 6 | Qwen 3.5 35B A3B | 2.4 | #482 |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=dragon-element-resizing · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.