DocFormBench (Docx-Skill): leaderboard

Format accuracy on DocFormBench (2026), a content-aware .docx formatting benchmark of 500 instances, with each model using the open-source Anthropic docx editing skill through the nanobot agent framework for at most 50 steps: the percent of required formatting attributes that exactly match the target. Higher is better.

Metric: Format accuracy (%) on DocFormBench: share of required formatting attributes of the 500 content-aware Text-to-Format instances (Chinese and English .docx documents of 12 types) that exactly match the target, averaged per object type (page, paragraph, table, image) and then over types; the Docx-Skill baseline (Anthropic's open-source Word editing skill, invoked through the nanobot agent framework; default settings, at most 50 inference steps); reasoning (thinking) disabled; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)25.57#701 (GLM-4.6V)
2Gemini 3 Flash (Minimal)23.55#164 (Gemini 3 Flash)
3DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)20.71#406 (DeepSeek V3.2)
4GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)18.19#486 (GLM-4.6)
5Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct15.53#522
6Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct12.36#619
7GPT-5 (Minimal)4.49#167 (GPT-5)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=docformbench-docx-skill · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.