DK-VLM - CV-Bench: leaderboard

DK-VLM v1; LoRA/geometric attention fine-tunes remain distinct from Qwen2.5VL7BInstruct and Qwen3VL8BInstruct backbones. Frozen VGGT-Omega 1B frontend; official shared six-benchmark GeoThinker evaluation settings. Comparison baseline scores are source-reported, starred GeoThinker values reproduced by authors; no automatic primary-board fusion. Table2 six spatial datasets; VSI overall already retained once from Table1, not duplicated here. Metric: Accuracy (%). Higher is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.22356v1

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen3-VL-8B (DK-VLM paper baseline)85.1
2GeoThinker-8B85.1
3DK-VLM-8B84.52
4GeoThinker-7B82.1
5VG-LLM-8B81.7
6DK-VLM-7B79.38
7Cambrian-S-7B76.9
8Qwen2.5-VL-7B (DK-VLM paper baseline)75.4
9VLM-3R-7B71.8

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=dk-vlm-cv-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-17.