DiagnosticIQ: leaderboard

Monitoring complex industrial assets relies on engineer-authored symbolic rules that trigger based on sensor conditions and prompt technicians to perform corrective actions. The bottleneck is not detection but response: translating rules into maintenance steps requires asset-specific knowledge gained through years of practice. We investigate whether LLMs can serve as decision support for this rule

Metric: Macro % D.IQ (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Around June 2027. 33 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.673.59#63
2GPT-5.473.27#79
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)72.74#58
4Claude 3.7 Sonnet70.61#249
5Qwen 3.6 35B A3B69.9#226
6DeepSeek V367.02#321
7GPT-565.89#98
8O165.41#183
9Gemma 4 31B65.06#200
10Claude Sonnet 4.664.84#90
11Llama 4 Maverick63.29#464
12Gemma 4 26B63.2#292
13Mistral Large63.15#710
14Claude Sonnet 462.52#199
15Llama 3.3 70B Instruct61.67#534

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=diagnosticiq · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.