DeliverBench - Process evaluation - P02: leaderboard

DeliverBench Table 5:11 persistent-workspace professional projects,150 sequential subtasks,seven exact model/harness systems. Harbor 0.20.0;4-hour task limit,1200-second setup; versions ClaudeCode 2.1.278,Codex 0.142.4,QwenCode 0.24.1,KimiCLI 1.50,GeminiCLI 0.60.0. Launcher requests high reasoning where supported; unknown per-provider support is not invented. GPT-5.6 Luna high judge applies expert signed rubrics; final delivery retains fatal acceptance gates, process averages submitted checkpoints. Native 0–100 rubric scores, not success rates; projects equally weighted in Mean. Metric: Rubric score (0–100).

Metric: Rubric score (0–100). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2030. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 550.69#16
2Qwen 3.8 Max44.54#34
3Kimi K344.31#35
4Gemini 3.8 Flash44.15#30
5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash43#37
6GLM-5.237.46#80
7GPT-5.6 Sol (High)35.15#22 (GPT-5.6 Sol)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=deliverbench-process-evaluation-p02 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.